Thursday, April 9, 2015

RESURRECTION WITHOUT REPENTANCE?

RESURRECTION WITHOUT REPENTANCE?
Thursday, April 09, 2015

John [MKJV] 10:9-10; 11:25-26 I [Jesus] am the door: by me if any man enter in, he shall be saved, and shall go in and out, and find pasture. 10 The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy: I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly. … 11:25 Jesus said unto her, I am the resurrection, and the life: he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live: 26 And whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die. Believest thou this?
Roman [MKJV] 12:1-3 I [Apostle Paul] beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that ye present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God, which is your reasonable service. 2 And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God. 3 For I say, through the grace given unto me, to every man that is among you, not to think of himself more highly than he ought to think; but to think soberly, according as God hath dealt to every man the measure of faith.
2Corinthians [GW] 12:6-9 If I [Apostle Paul] ever wanted to brag, I wouldn't be a fool. Instead, I would be telling the truth. But I'm going to spare you so that no one may think more of me than what he sees or hears about me, 7 especially because of the excessive number of revelations that I've had. Therefore, to keep me from becoming conceited, I am forced to deal with a recurring problem. That problem, Satan's messenger, torments me to keep me from being conceited. 8 I begged the Lord three times to take it away from me. 9 But he told me: "My kindness is all you need. My power is strongest when you are weak." So I will brag even more about my weaknesses in order that Christ's power will live in me.

  As well they should, special times of Christian celebration raises questions in the minds of many people. Some even are courageous enough to verbalize their questions. I commend them, answer them, pray and hope for their edification, but do know rejection may be their response.
  Easter is one of those times, with one question having been raised being “Which is more important, resurrection or repentance?”
  I answer with illustration by personal testimony: In the first paragraph I mentioned rejection, that which has been my paramount emotional bugaboo much interfering with my desire for maturation; at one time distracting largely, now a beneficial reminder of stumbling. How so? Only as I live in the power of his resurrection have I been able, will I continue to be able to live in repentance of this detrimental hindering product of my pride. The point being that without Christ’s resurrection, I nor anyone else may be saved. (Jn.11:26-27) And without His resurrection we cannot truly worship in and through repentance and realize abundant life in the power of His resurrection (Jn.10:9-10; Rom.12:1-3; Phil.3:10).  EBB4

From International Standard Bible Encyclopedia:
Repentance
rḗ-pen´tans:
I.     OLD TESTAMENT TERMS
1.    To Repent - “to Pant,” “to Sigh”
2.    To Repent - “to Turn” or “Return”
II.   NEW TESTAMENT TERMS
1.    Repent - “to Care,” “Be Concerned”
2.    Repent - “to Change the Mind”
3.    Repent - “to Turn Over,” “to Turn Upon,” “to Turn Unto”
III. THE PSYCHOLOGICAL ELEMENTS
1.    The Intellectual Element
2.    The Emotional Element
3.    The Volitional Element
LITERATURE
To get an accurate idea of the precise New Testament meaning of this highly important word it is necessary to consider its approximate synonyms in the original Hebrew and Greek The psychological elements of repentance should be considered in the light of the general teaching of Scripture.

I. Old Testament Terms.
1. To Repent - “To Pant,” “To Sigh”:
The Hebrew word נחם, nāḥam, is an onomatopoetic term which implies difficulty in breathing, hence, “to pant,” “to sigh,” “to groan.” Naturally it came to signify “to lament” or “to grieve,” and when the emotion was produced by the desire of good for others, it merged into compassion and sympathy, and when incited by a consideration of one's own character and deeds it means “to rue,” “to repent.” To adapt language to our understanding, God is represented as repenting when delayed penalties are at last to be inflicted, or when threatened evils have been averted by genuine reformation (Gen_6:6; Jon_3:10). This word is translated “repent” about 40 times in the Old Testament, and in nearly all cases it refers to God. The principal idea is not personal relation to sin, either in its experience of grief or in turning from an evil course. Yet the results of sin are manifest in its use. God's heart is grieved at man's iniquity, and in love He bestows His grace, or in justice He terminates His mercy. It indicates the aroused emotions of God which prompt Him to a different course of dealing with the people. Similarly when used with reference to man, only in this case the consciousness of personal transgression is evident. This distinction in the application of the word is intended by such declarations as God “is not a man, that he should repent” (1Sa_15:29; Job_42:6; Jer_8:6).

2. To Repent - “To Turn” or “Return”:
The term שׁוּב, shūbh, is most generally employed to express the Scriptural idea of genuine repentance. It is used extensively by the prophets, and makes prominent the idea of a radical change in one's attitude toward sin and God. It implies a conscious, moral separation, and a personal decision to forsake sin and to enter into fellowship with God. It is employed extensively with reference to man's turning away from sin to righteousness (Deu_4:30; Neh_1:9; Psa_7:12; Jer_3:14). It quite often refers to God in His relation to man (Exo_32:12; Jos_7:26). It is employed to indicate the thorough spiritual change which God alone can effect (Psa_85:4). When the term is translated by “return” it has reference either to man, to God, or to God and man (1Sa_7:3; Psa_90:13 (both terms, nāḥam and shūbh; Isa_21:12; Isa_55:7). Both terms are also sometimes employed when the twofold idea of grief and altered relation is expressed, and are translated by “repent” and “return” (Eze_14:6; Hos_12:6; Jon_3:8).

II. New Testament Terms.
1. Repent - “To Care,” “Be Concerned”:
The term μεταμέλομαι, metamélomai, literally signifies to have a feeling or care, concern or regret; like nāḥam, it expresses the emotional aspect of repentance. The feeling indicated by the word may issue in genuine repentance, or it may degenerate into mere remorse (Mat_21:29, Mat_21:32; Mat_27:3). Judas repented only in the sense of regret, remorse, and not in the sense of the abandonment of sin. The word is used with reference to Paul's feeling concerning a certain course of conduct, and with reference to God in His attitude toward His purposes of grace (2Co_7:8 the King James Version; Heb_7:21).

2. Repent - “To Change the Mind”:
The word μετανοέω, metanoéō, expresses the true New Testament idea of the spiritual change implied in a sinner's return to God. The term signifies “to have another mind,” to change the opinion or purpose with regard to sin. It is equivalent to the Old Testament word “turn.” Thus, it is employed by John the Baptist, Jesus, and the apostles (Mat_3:2; Mar_1:15; Act_2:38). The idea expressed by the word is intimately associated with different aspects of spiritual transformation and of Christian life, with the process in which the agency of man is prominent, as faith (Act_20:21), and as conversion (Act_3:19); also with those experiences and blessings of which God alone is the author, as remission and forgiveness of sin (Luk_24:47; Act_5:31). It is sometimes conjoined with baptism, which as an overt public act proclaims a changed relation to sin and God (Mar_1:4; Luk_3:3; Act_13:24; Act_19:4). As a vital experience, repentance is to manifest its reality by producing good fruits appropriate to the new spiritual life (Mat_3:8).

3. Repent - “To Turn over,” “To Turn upon,” “To Turn Unto”:
The word έπιστρέφω, epistréphō, is used to bring out more clearly the distinct change wrought in repentance. It is employed quite frequently in Acts to express the positive side of a change involved in New Testament repentance, or to indicate the return to God of which the turning from sin is the negative aspect. The two conceptions are inseparable and complementary. The word is used to express the spiritual transition from sin to God (Act_9:35; 1Th_1:9); to strengthen the idea of faith (Act_11:21); and to complete and emphasize the change required by New Testament repentance (Act_26:20).
There is great difficulty in expressing the true idea of a change of thought with reference to sin when we translate the New Testament “repentance” into other languages. The Latin version renders it “exercise penitence” (poenitentiam agere). But “penitence” etymologically signifies pain, grief, distress, rather than a change of thought and purpose. Thus Latin Christianity has been corrupted by the pernicious error of presenting grief over sin rather than abandonment of sin as the primary idea of New Testament repentance. It was easy to make the transition from penitence to penance, consequently the Romanists represent Jesus and the apostles as urging people to do penance (poenitentiam agite). The English word “repent” is derived from the Latin repoenitere, and inherits the fault of the Latin, making grief the principal idea and keeping it in the background, if not altogether out of sight, the fundamental New Testament conception of a change of mind with reference to sin. But the exhortations of the ancient prophets, of Jesus, and of the apostles show that the change of mind is the dominant idea of the words employed, while the accompanying grief and consequent reformation enter into one's experience from the very nature of the case.

III. The Psychological Elements.
1. The Intellectual Element:
Repentance is that change of a sinner's mind which leads him to turn from his evil ways and live. The change wrought in repentance is so deep and radical as to affect the whole spiritual nature and to involve the entire personality. The intellect must function, the emotions must be aroused, and the will must act. Psychology shows repentance to be profound, personal and all-pervasive. The intellectual element is manifest from the nature of man as an intelligent being, and from the demands of God who desires only rational service. Man must apprehend sin as unutterably heinous, the divine law as perfect and inexorable, and himself as coming short or falling below the requirements of a holy God (Job_42:5, Job_42:6; Psa_51:3; Rom_3:20).

2. The Emotional Element:
There may be a knowledge of sin without turning from it as an awful thing which dishonors God and ruins man. The change of view may lead only to a dread of punishment and not to the hatred and abandonment of sin (Exo_9:27; Num_22:34; Jos_7:20; 1Sa_15:24; Mat_27:4). An emotional element is necessarily involved in repentance. While feeling is not the equivalent of repentance, it nevertheless may be a powerful impulse to a genuine turning from sin. A penitent cannot from the nature of the case be stolid and indifferent. The emotional attitude must be altered if New Testament repentance be experienced. There is a type of grief that issues in repentance and another which plunges into remorse. There is a godly sorrow and also a sorrow of the world. The former brings life; the latter, death (Mat_27:3; Luk_18:23; 2Co_7:9, 2Co_7:10). There must be a consciousness of sin in its effect on man and in its relation to God before there can be a hearty turning away from unrighteousness. The feeling naturally accompanying repentance implies a conviction of personal sin and sinfulness and an earnest appeal to God to forgive according to His mercy (Psa_51:1, Psa_51:2, Psa_51:10-14).

3. The Volitional Element:
The most prominent element in the psychology of repentance is the voluntary, or volitional. This aspect of the penitent's experience is expressed in the Old Testament by “turn”, or “return,” and in the New Testament by “repent” or “turn.” The words employed in the Hebrew and Greek place chief emphasis on the will, the change of mind, or of purpose, because a complete and sincere turning to God involves both the apprehension of the nature of sin and the consciousness of personal guilt (Jer_25:5; Mar_1:15; Act_2:38; 2Co_7:9, 2Co_7:10). The demand for repentance implies free will and individual responsibility. That men are called upon to repent there can be no doubt, and that God is represented as taking the initiative in repentance is equally clear. The solution of the problem belongs to the spiritual sphere. The psychical phenomena have their origin in the mysterious relations of the human and the divine personalities. There can be no external substitute for the internal change. Sackcloth for the body and remorse for the soul are not to be confused with a determined abandonment of sin and return to God. Not material sacrifice, but a spiritual change, is the inexorable demand of God in both dispensations (Psa_51:17; Isa_1:11; Jer_6:20; Hos_6:6).
Repentance is only a condition of salvation and not its meritorious ground. The motives for repentance are chiefly found in the goodness of God, in divine love, in the pleading desire to have sinners saved, in the inevitable consequences of sin, in the universal demands of the gospel, and in the hope of spiritual life and membership in the kingdom of heaven (Eze_33:11; Mar_1:15; Luk_13:1-5; Joh_3:16; Act_17:30; Rom_2:4; 1Ti_2:4). The first four beatitudes (Mat_5:3-6) form a heavenly ladder by which penitent souls pass from the dominion of Satan into the Kingdom of God. A consciousness of spiritual poverty dethroning pride, a sense of personal unworthiness producing grief, a willingness to surrender to God in genuine humility, and a strong spiritual desire developing into hunger and thirst, enter into the experience of one who wholly abandons sin and heartily turns to Him who grants repentance unto life.

Literature.

Various theological works and commentaries Note especially Strong, Systematic Theology, III, 832-36; Broadus on Mat_3:2, American Comm.; article “Busse” (Penance). Hauck-Herzog, Realencyklopadie fur protestantische Theologie und Kirche.

Wednesday, April 8, 2015

WHAT WOULD JESUS DO AS A BAKER?

WWJD AS A BAKER?
Wednesday, April 8, 2015

Would Jesus Bake a Cake for a Gay Wedding? (Part 1)

Posted on LAST RESISTANCE on April 7, 2015 by Michael Minkoff

  Are you tired of talking about gay wedding cakes? I am too, actually. But do you know what I’m more tired of? People putting words in Jesus’ mouth. A lot of probably well-intentioned people are going around telling Christians that they need to act more like Jesus and bake some gay wedding cakes. I would really like to dispel some of the fog that hangs over their arguments like the San Francisco smug cloud.
  First, let’s start with the fact that Jesus hung out with prostitutes, tax-gatherers, and other sin-filled outcasts. That’s quite true. But I would like to point out a few things about this. One, homosexuals are probably not happy that you are comparing them to prostitutes, tax-gatherers, and other sin-filled outcasts. Either homosexuality is not sin, and Christians should accept it as an alternative righteous path. Or homosexuality is sin (like fornication and usury), and, like Jesus, we should compassionately call homosexuals to repentance.
  Some people point to Jesus and the woman caught in adultery as a sign that Jesus “didn’t judge.” But he did judge, even in this case. He judged that the Pharisees were not properly following the law: they did not bring forward two witnesses to the adultery who were innocent of the adultery (as the law required) and they had also failed to bring the man caught in adultery. In other words, they were not following the judicial law of Israel. But Jesus didn’t stop there. He sent the adulteress away with these words, “Go and sin no more.” How close-minded of Jesus.
  The prostitutes and tax-gatherers that Jesus ministered to were sinners Jesus had come to heal. He said so much in response to the Pharisees’ criticisms. Just read the account in Mark 2:15–17:
  And it happened that He was reclining at the table in his house, and many tax collectors and sinners were dining with Jesus and His disciples; for there were many of them, and they were following Him. When the scribes of the Pharisees saw that He was eating with the sinners and tax collectors, they said to His disciples, “Why is He eating and drinking with tax collectors and sinners?” And hearing this, Jesus said to them, “It is not those who are healthy who need a physician, but those who are sick; I did not come to call the righteous, but sinners.”
  Notice from this passage that Jesus fell directly between the perspectives of his day. He didn’t agree with the Pharisees that even great sinners should be outcasts from society. He treated them with dignity, empathy, and love. But he also didn’t just accept sinners as they were. He didn’t come to sinners to leave them as they were. He came to them to fundamentally transform them. He wanted to leave them ex-tax gatherers (like Zaccheus) and ex-prostitutes (like Mary Magdalene). That’s an important point. Christians need to be like Jesus in compassion and understanding. But it is not Christ-like to tolerate sin in one’s friends. It is Christ-like to seek healing for the sins of your friends.
  Self-congratulatory, “open-minded” Jesus appropriators indicate that Christians should accept homosexuals because Jesus accepted sinners. That’s not exactly the case. Jesus loved sinners. He still does. But his love for them would not allow him to leave them as he found them.
  So what does that mean for Christians and homosexuals? For one, it’s quite a stretch to say that the only way to love homosexuals is to do for them whatever they ask, no matter how much it goes against what you believe is right. Forget baking cakes for a moment. What if one of your good friends, a practicing homosexual, asked you to be in his gay wedding? Would you be his “groomsman”? I think it is more helpful to think about this in those terms.
  Because Jesus wasn’t dealing with strangers at his table. He was dealing with his friends. To say that baking a cake for a stranger is the same as dining with your fault-filled friends is quite the stretch. To say the least. And it continues to smack of the very self-righteousness that Jesus condemned, and of which so-called “homophobes” are continuously accused.
  So, what if Christian bakers were to try this tack instead: A homosexual comes into their store and asks for a gay wedding cake. The baker says, “I don’t believe gay marriage is right or good, and I don’t feel comfortable being party to a gay wedding ceremony. But I don’t have anything against you as a person, and I would love to get to know you and find out more about where you are coming from. Would you and your boyfriend/girlfriend like to come to my house for dinner? I’ll even bake a cake.”

  Maybe we could bridge some of the animosity that keeps growing between orthodox Christians and homosexuals. And maybe the gospel would actually be forwarded. Either way, it seems like something Jesus would do.

Tuesday, April 7, 2015

RESURRECTION IS ALWAYS IN SEASON

RESURRECTION IS ALWAYS IN SEASON
Tuesday, April 07, 2015

John [MKJV] 6:37-40  All that the Father gives Me shall come to Me, and the one who comes to Me I will in no way cast out. For I came down from Heaven, not to do My own will but the will of Him who sent Me. And this is the will of the Father who sent Me, that of all which He has given Me I should lose nothing but should raise it up again at the last day. And this is the will of Him who sent Me, that everyone who sees the Son and believes on Him should have everlasting life. And I will raise him up at the last day.
John [MKJV] 11:23-26  Jesus said to her, Your brother shall rise again. Martha said to Him, I know that he shall rise again in the resurrection at the last day. Jesus said to her, I am the Resurrection and the Life! He who believes in Me, though he die, yet he shall live. And whoever lives and believes in Me shall never die. Do you believe this?
2Corinthians [MKJV] 5:1-10  For we know that if our earthly house of this tabernacle were dissolved, we have a building from God, a house not made with hands, eternal in the heavens. For indeed in this we groan, earnestly desiring to be clothed with our dwelling-place out of Heaven; if indeed in being clothed, we shall not be found naked. For we who are in this tabernacle groan, being burdened; inasmuch as we do not wish to be unclothed, but to be clothed, so that the mortal might be swallowed up by the life. And He who has worked in us for this same thing is God, who also is giving to us the earnest of the Spirit. Then being always confident, knowing that while we are at home in the body, we are away from home from the Lord; for we walk by faith, not by sight; then we are confident and we are pleased rather to go away from home out of the body, and to come home to the Lord. Therefore we are also laboring to be well-pleasing to Him, whether at home or away from home. For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each one may receive the things done through the body, according to that which he has done, whether good or bad.

  I decided to begin this day with a Word search in KJV New Testament.
  Using e-Sword I type in “salvation”, finding 43 verses, 45 mentions.
  Because of the time of year I next type in “resurrection”, finding 41 times in 40 verses.
  Moving on, I discover the truth of raising up having to do with resurrection is in 8-10 verses.
  Hmmm… we Christians talk about salvation often, but other than counting funeral mentions, resurrection seldom outside of Easter time. Pondering a bit more I realize that far more time is spent on the birth of Jesus than on the topic of resurrection.
  I’m wonder if emphasis on convenience of “saved from” over “resurrected to” reflects a emotional and functional preference on our part?
  Resurrection is not something apart from salvation; they are inseparable; without resurrection there is no salvation! The gospel (good news) very much includes resurrection.
  “Now if Christ be preached that he rose from the dead, how say some among you that there is no resurrection of the dead? But if there be no resurrection of the dead, then is Christ not risen: And if Christ be not risen, then is our preaching vain, and your faith is also vain.” (1Cor.15:12-14)
  By all means let us celebrate Jesus’ resurrection at Eastertide . . . and to give more thought and conversation to His, our resurrection; the fullness of Christ’ deliverance.
  Resurrection is not seasonal. It is the season of life for those trusting The Resurrected One. 

EBB4 (Originally written March 28, 2010)

Monday, April 6, 2015

LIFE WITHOUT RESURRECTION

LIFE WITHOUT RESURRECTION
Monday, April 06, 2015

1Peter [GW] 1:3-9 Praise the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ! God has given us a new birth because of his great mercy. We have been born into a new life that has a confidence which is alive because Jesus Christ has come back to life. We have been born into a new life which has an inheritance that can't be destroyed or corrupted and can't fade away. That inheritance is kept in heaven for you, since you are guarded by God's power through faith for a salvation that is ready to be revealed at the end of time. You are extremely happy about these things, even though you have to suffer different kinds of trouble for a little while now. The purpose of these troubles is to test your faith as fire tests how genuine gold is. Your faith is more precious than gold, and by passing the test, it gives praise, glory, and honor to God. This will happen when Jesus Christ appears again. Although you have never seen Christ, you love him. You don't see him now, but you believe in him. You are extremely happy with joy and praise that can hardly be expressed in words as you obtain the salvation that is the goal of your faith.

  An oxymoron is figure of speech in which 2 or more contradictory words are combined to make a point, sometimes becoming a well-worn cliché. For example: “thunderous silence” “sweet sorrow” “a fine mess” “accurate estimate” “accidently on purpose” “awful pretty” “Amtrak schedule”, and my all time favorites, “all natural artificial flavoring” “genuine simulated leather” and “a little pregnant”.
  Today’s title, “life without resurrection”, is just such play on words, carrying a meaning, but actually an oxymoron; there being no life without resurrection!
  Without Christ’ resurrection personally ours, this temporal world sojourn whether it pleasurable or disagreeable, prosperous or poor, is naught but existent plodding in eternal death. (Jn.3:18)
  Study His Word and we discover believers trusting Lord Jesus Christ possess resurrection now. But are we living as resurrected? Do we walk in the power of Jesus’ resurrection? Do we know the supremacy of His resurrection? (Phil.3:9-10)
  Wonderful though it be, Jesus did not come and die that men may only escape eternal damnation. He came that men may realize abundant life here and now; accomplished only through personal experience of His resurrection power. Without it we will not be His confidant or realize relational inherent godly confidence. (Jn.10:7-11; Phil.3:1-11)
  As His family, we are created by and in Christ Jesus a resurrected people unto good works, which God has before ordained that we should exactly walk in them. (Eph.2:10)
  Live as resurrected, for “you hath he quickened [made alive!], who were dead in trespasses and sins” (Eph.2:1) 
EBB4


Friday, April 3, 2015

THEONOMY AS A RULE?

THEONOMY AS A RULE?
Friday, April 3, 2015

Possibly you have yet to hear of this movement that is influencing some. Be aware. Be warned!
EBB4

"What is dominion theology / theonomy / Christian reconstructionism?"

  Dominion theology refers to a line of theological interpretation and thought with regard to the role of the church in contemporary society. Dominion theology is also known as Christian reconstructionism and theonomy. Dominion theology states that biblical Christianity will rule all areas of society, personal and corporate. Christian reconstructionism reasons that society will be reconstructed by the Law of God as preached in the gospel and the Great Commission. Theonomy is a post-millennial view believing that all of the moral laws contained in the Old Testament are yet binding today. Although these might sound somewhat disparate, they have all been closely linked together to the point that people often use the terms interchangeably.
  Those who hold these views believe that it is the duty of Christians to create a worldwide kingdom patterned after the Mosaic Law. They believe that Christ will not return to earth until such a kingdom has been established. The principal goal, then, of dominion theology and Christian reconstructionism is political and religious domination of the world through the implementation of the moral laws, and subsequent punishments, of the Old Testament (the sacrificial and ceremonial laws having been fulfilled in the New Testament). This is not a government system ruled by the church, but rather a government conformed to the Law of God.
  Dominion theology / Christian reconstructionism is largely based upon a post-millennial view of covenantalism. Post-millennial refers to the belief that Christ will return to earth after the thousand-year reign of God's kingdom, and covenantalism refers to the belief that biblical history is divided into three major covenants supposedly described in Scripture—of redemption, of works, and of grace. Adherents believe that we currently exist under the covenant of grace, and that the church has replaced Israel, and we are now in the millennial Kingdom of God. Man, under the covenant of grace, is responsible to rule the world, to hold dominion over it, in obedience to the laws of God.
  The problem with these beliefs is that they rest upon a distorted view of Scripture. Scripture clearly teaches a premillennial view of the Kingdom of God (Zechariah 14:4-9; Matthew 25:31-34), the "covenant of grace" is an extra-biblical construct, Israel and the Church are distinct throughout biblical history and prophecy, and God never commanded the Church to revamp society. Instead, believers are commanded to preach the Gospel as in Matthew 28:19, 20, but God clearly intends to implement worldwide reform Himself (Revelation 19:11-20:4). Though it is clearly unbiblical, dominion theology persists. It is, in fact, a great threat to biblical Christianity. Once at home solely within Reformed circles, dominion theology and Christian reconstructionism are now creeping into many Protestant churches and are making a large impact on the beliefs of Charismatic churches in particular.
  As with any new teaching we are exposed to, we need to be like the Bereans of Acts 17:11: "And the people of Berea were more open-minded than those in Thessalonica, and they listened eagerly to Paul's message. They searched the Scriptures day after day to check up on Paul and Silas, to see if they were really teaching the truth." Dominion theology / Christian reconstructionism doesn't align with what we read in the Scriptures. Although this is just a "nutshell" summary of dominion theology, the points made are very clear. Dominion theology is not a theology for a believer to live by, but rather one to avoid.
© Copyright 2002-2015 Got Questions Ministries

Thursday, April 2, 2015

CHOO CHOO WHOO WHOO

CHOO CHOO WHOO WHOO
Thursday, April 02, 2015

  Anybody that knows me knows that my fun is not watching team sports, but I do enjoy relaxing with a pleasant stroll in an old cemetery or meandering thru words and photos of history. Recently I took occasion to do both. Sunday afternoon I invested an hour in Elk City Cemetery, officially established 1865. Elk City was a town to be, but now with few houses left, some, including the old general store, crumbling, and the well attended Ponderosa Saloon.
  Sunday’s steps left me with a few questions. Some answered, some not: Why is it that so often the last business to survive in a dying or dead community is the barroom? Who were the dreamers, the planners, and what were they like? What killed the town?
  I type in “ghost towns of Nebraska” and find listed 81 defunct or drastically diminished towns. Almartha, Amboy, Anoka, Antioch, Bazille Mills (Several producing fine woolen cloth.), Colberger, Copenhagen, Eden Valley, Factoryville, Gosper, Hecla, Herman, Jim Town, Mars, Marsland, Monowi, Norway, Roscoe, Sparks, Strang, Vacoma, Xenia, and more . . .
  All don’t have explanation of demise but the ones that do are various. Reading them reminds that it wasn’t just clapboard and/or bricks, post office or dance hall. They were people, families with hopes and dreams that died when railroad or highway moved, dust bowled, locusts devoured, fire destroyed, tornadoes swept, barons bilked, farms upsized. (The latter still today a community diminisher.)
  I share a tale of barony irony: Cleveland, Nebraska, was a small town located outside of present day Columbus, NE. In about 1865 Cleveland was established by settlers from the old colonial frontier of Ohio. Union Pacific Railroad went through Columbus 1866. Population about 75, now about 22,500.  Not long thereafter UPRR official George Francis Train decided Columbus would make an excellent new location for the USA nation's capital and saw the small neighboring community of Cleveland as a future competitive problem so he bought all buildings in Cleveland and destroyed them. And, as we well know, the District of Columbia never moved from bog to high country.
  I wonder how many did or did not consider Christ’ cautionary words: “[Jesus] told the people, "Be careful to guard yourselves from every kind of greed. Life is not about having a lot of material possessions." Then he used this illustration. He said, "A rich man had land that produced good crops. He thought, 'What should I do? I don't have enough room to store my crops.' He said, 'I know what I'll do. I'll tear down my barns and build bigger ones so that I can store all my grain and goods in them. Then I'll say to myself, "You've stored up a lot of good things for years to come. Take life easy, eat, drink, and enjoy yourself."' "But God said to him, 'You fool! I will demand your life from you tonight! Now who will get what you've accumulated?' That's how it is when a person has material riches but is not rich in his relationship with God." Then Jesus said to his disciples, "So I tell you to stop worrying about what you will eat or wear. Life is more than food, and the body is more than clothes. Consider the crows. They don't plant or harvest. They don't even have a storeroom or a barn. Yet, God feeds them. You are worth much more than birds. "Can any of you add an hour to your life by worrying? If you can't do a small thing like that, why worry about other things? Consider how the flowers grow. They never work or spin yarn for clothes. But I say that not even Solomon in all his majesty was dressed like one of these flowers. That's the way God clothes the grass in the field. Today it's alive, and tomorrow it's thrown into an incinerator. So how much more will he clothe you people who have so little faith? "Don't concern yourself about what you will eat or drink, and quit worrying about these things. Everyone in the world is concerned about these things, but your Father knows you need them. Rather, be concerned about his kingdom. Then these things will be provided for you.” Luke [GW] 12:15-31 
EBB4


PS. For those interested, go to http://www.ghosttowns.com/  and investigate your area.

Wednesday, April 1, 2015

PEACE MAGNIFIES

PEACE MAGNIFIES
Wednesday, April 01, 2015

Luke [MKJV] chapter 1 …  the angel came in to her [Mary] and said, Hail, one receiving grace, the Lord is with you. Blessed are you among women … blessed is she who believes, for there shall be a perfecting of those things which were told her from the Lord. And Mary said, My soul magnifies the Lord, and my spirit has rejoiced in God my Savior. For He looked on the humiliation of His slave woman. For, behold, from now on all generations shall count me blessed. For the Mighty One has done great things for me; and holy is His name. And His mercy is on those who fear Him from generation to generation. He has worked power with His arm, He has scattered the proud in the imagination of their heart. He has put down rulers from their seats and exalted the lowly, He has filled the hungry with good things, and He has sent away the rich empty. He has helped His servant Israel, in remembrance of His mercy, as He spoke to our fathers, to Abraham and to his seed forever. …

  Mary, though unwed pregnant teen, a status very much snubbed in that day’s community, had the “peace that passeth all understanding” long before the Apostle Paul understood, accepted, and wrote of it. (Phil.4:4-13)
  I have never been or shall be in Mary’s condition, but have been so otherwise; unexpected stress being common to life. Personal peace through trusting the Lord is not. Sadly, trusting Him for the free gift of eternal salvation too often is separate from accepting operative exercise of trusting Him for peace.
  Mary declared aloud that her soul at-peace trusting God magnified the Lord!
  So we see there is more to peace than serenity. In living, we have the potential to enlarge the Lord, or minimize Him.
  Much more, for it is as a wheel moving in direction pleasing to God: peace allowing increased Logos edification, the increase making for greater peace, greater peace allowing for further edification, -->>>>.
  Hear God’s Word: “Never worry about anything. But in every situation let God know what you need in prayers and requests while giving thanks. Then God's peace, which goes beyond anything we can imagine, will guard your thoughts and emotions through Christ Jesus.” (GW Phil.4:6-7)
  Let us trust Him for the peace unlike any peace the world offers. (Jn.14:27) And in His peace thereby mature in all ways pleasing God Almighty. And in maturation gain peace that enables the wonderful wheel to move forward and upward.
EBB4