THE SPIRITUAL MAN IS UNNATURAL MAN
Thursday, November 21, 2019
Proverbs [GW] 3:5-7 Trust the LORD with all
your heart, and do not rely on your own understanding. In all your ways
acknowledge him, and he will make your paths smooth. Do not consider yourself
wise. Fear the LORD, and turn away from evil.
Romans 12:1-2 I beseech you therefore,
brethren, by the mercies of God, that ye present your bodies a living
sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God, which is your reasonable service. And be
not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your
mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of
God.
Galatians 5 … the fruit of the Spirit is
love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, Meekness,
temperance …
We call it the
New Testament, but how much of what it says is new? The NT, including Jesus’
words recorded therein, refers to and explains the OT in new terms and/or
illustration (parables et al). The initial chapters of Paul’s first letter to
the assembly at Corinth is an example of this. Paul, using “natural man” and
comparative “spiritual man” speaks of the same truth of Proverbs 3:5; truth he,
as Saul, initially realized on the road to Damascus. (Act.9:1-6)
Reading
1Corinthians chapters 1 & 2 we see that the natural man is a person blinded
by measuring what God says by this world’s yardstick; familial, community
cultural, prior secular philosophy and education. This natural man is the blind
individual that Jesus refers to in John 3:3, Nicodemus being another exemplary
before and after model.
Both Nicodemus and persecutor Saul were highly
educated and contemplative men, howbeit blind to true spiritual edification.
One does not however have to be elite. We can be illiterate or somewhere in
between on a literate knowledge scale, and still gain the blessed vision of a
spiritual man. (Ps.1)
Nicodemus and
Paul especially exemplify the problem of religious education prior to
confrontation by the Word. The same text they had head knowledge of, but as
natural men obviously did not understand until trusting the word and gaining
John 3:3 spiritual vision.
Who, what, is a
spiritual man? Am I?
If I read and
contemplate God’s Word, living (Jn.1:1, 14; 2Pet.3:5-7) and written (Ps.119;
Jn.17:17; 2Tim.3:16-17) . . . and compare, measure the Word by what I know
previous to my John 3:3 redemption . . . I am not a spiritual person, I am a natural
man unregenerate in contemplation . . . and consequently in deed.
Writing to the
assembled saints at Corinth Paul explains clearly that the spiritual person has
the mind of Christ; evaluating all things having to do with life and death accordingly.
He explained just as clearly that the natural person evaluates everything according
to philosophy and values contrary to the mind of Christ.
One respondent believes
the “fruit of the Spirit” is the better way to evaluate whether spiritual or
not. I agree that the spiritual person will manifest the fruit of the Spirit.
However, this is not the prime evidence of being a spiritual person.
I have known, do
know, non-Christians, atheists, agnostics -- those that reject the mind of
Christ – that believe in and exhibit love, joy, serenity, forgiveness,
gentleness, goodness, devotion, humbleness, and self-control . . . and do so
manifestly more than some professing Christians I have and/or do know.
Whether spiritual
or natural, the order is always beliefs > attitude > actions in word and
deed.
EBB4
PS. If as a professing Christian we are amiss in word and
deed, we need to examine our belief.
No comments:
Post a Comment