SAMIZDAT
Wednesday, June 10, 2020
2Timothy [MKJV] 2:1-3 Therefore, my son, be strong in the
grace that is in Christ Jesus. And the things that you have heard from me among
many witnesses, commit the same to faithful men who will be able to teach
others also. Therefore endure hardness, as a good soldier of Jesus Christ.
While reading I
learned a new word, samizdat. It is a Russian operative word having to do with
the dissident political movement beginning many decades ago. The word means “to copy”, in particular doing
so covertly in opposition to political powers.
Certain books and
literature (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_Zhivago_(novel)
, the Bible, western newspapers and magazines, et al.) was forbidden and people
were prosecuted severely, even sent to concentration camps in Siberia, for
possessing or reading them. As in some
countries today, China for instance, a single or small number of an original
publication is smuggled across the border, and copies are made. This sometimes
done laboriously by hand. Sometimes the literature involved is broken down in
portions and circulated.
Imagine reading
the middle chapter of a novel and then chapter 3 and then ….
Or reading 2Peter
chapter 3 and then John chapter 6 and then …..
Consider the
early decades of the church (A.D). as the gospels and epistles (Letters to
congregations.) were written, sent, copied, circulated . . . it was not a
matter of as with our reading and studying Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Acts,
Romans, 1Corinthians, 2Corinthians ….
We can say this
is not Russia under draconian communism, or restrictive China, or brutally
Sharian ISIL, but what if current national and international trends against *Christian
continue? Will we then fulfill the Apostle Paul’s urging to Timothy?
EBB4
*It is Christian that is
being opposed. It’s personal! When one suffers, all suffer. G5546
Χριστιανός;
Christianos; khris-tee-an-os' From Strong’s G5547; a Christian, that is, follower of
Christ: - Christian. Note 1Corinthians 12:26; 1Timothy 3:12. Of concern this
morning I read in the Omaha World-Herald (Nebraska, USA) that in reaction to recent events: “The
addition of a hate intimidation offense to the municipal code [of Omaha] gives
prosecutors another tool to charge someone if he or she commits a crime against
someone based on age, race, gender, gender identity, ethnicity or other
protected classes.” This leaves me with questions: Who by and how will hate be
defined in various incidents? What’s with the “other protected classes”?
No comments:
Post a Comment